It’s the new update. The beta version was released a few days ago. It’s a one time charge to remove it and it allows high resolution saves. It was $2.99US.View attachment 163450
Image apped in others apps and then those images melded in FotoDa. Even though I bought it ages ago, I’m now getting the FotoDa watermark. It’s easy to remove, but I wonder why.
yeah a few people suggested the watermark... now some people complained so I took it out... little minor update on the store later today or tomorrow I assume 2.7.1It’s the new update. The beta version was released a few days ago. It’s a one time charge to remove it and it allows high resolution saves. It was $2.99US.
yeah a few people suggested the watermark... now some people complained so I took it out... little minor update on the store later today or tomorrow I assume 2.7.1
What she said!Congrats on the update, Zevan
Re the watermark: From what I see in App Store reviews, a lot of people think all apps should be free for all time. Don’t know what they think devs should live on.
fwiw I think a watermark on a free ‘try before you buy’ version is perfectly reasonable. Sensible, if you want to encourage people to contribute three *!@!&! dollars to the R&D.
Agreed.1
What she said!
Very effective -- those faded colors work well with all that dark.A tree grows in Brooklyn
View attachment 163604
Hen Pecked
View attachment 163625
love this - simple composition & beautiful rich colours
I like it, it looks like the elements belong together.An unexpected FotoDa....the first one that popped up when I opened it. Do you think I can find that spider web???View attachment 163780