rizole
It's not even my banana.
I thought of doing a rolling stone type cover for the album cover thread in the same vein of previous rolling stone covers I've done. I didn't do it in the end as I took the rolling stones magazine title from an actual rolling stones cover I got off the internet and wasn't sure that would be covered by "Mobile only" rules. Stopped me submitting. Stopped me wanting to participate to be honest..I'll run this till 1st Nov, seven entries so far
Previous submissions I made to the album cover thread that included stock were deleted without notice or consultation. I didn't even have the notice to retract them myself.
I think the mobile only rule is unhelpful in it's narrow definition and needs more thought.Intrigued by the nomination of this one juryjone gives credit for the image to someone else. Presumably he added the cat and edited it a little.
Is the nomination for the editing? Are we 100% sure it was a mobile image to start with?
Tech, phones, platforms and apps have moved on since mobitog first started and there's a substantial proportion of pics posted here that don't have pixels in them that were not on the original pic or came from some other app or library.
Personally I'd like some clarity on rules about sources. I think the current rules don't address the current decade's technological whatsits.
I should probably raise this in a different thread but here we are.
Last edited: