I’ve liked all your graphite edits, Ted — are you using free or subscription version ?
Nominations for the April Image of the Month (IotM) close at the end of the day on Tuesday, April 30. Get your four nominations in!
View attachment 163767
Running the canal... multiexposure with Hipstamatic classic
Thanks. It's the first style in Graphite and works really well on structures with a little tweaking of the options.Fabulous love the edit
I haven't subscribed to anything, but whether I'm using a free version or got grandfathered in for being an early adopter, I'm not sure. I think I bought it the first day it came out, and I don't see anything bugging me to upgrade.liked all your graphite edits, Ted — are you using free or subscription version ?
“DE”?good subject for the DE
The gift that keeps on giving. Beautiful.
Double exposure. Looks like it’s actually the Hipsta Multi-exposure Kit?“DE”?
I’m a bit slow... yes your right it was the double exposure... I don’t use it that oftenDouble exposure. Looks like it’s actually the Hipsta Multi-exposure Kit?
View attachment 163828
The BoardWalk Sydney’s south coast. Hipstamatic Tinto/D-TypePlate
well worth it as wellAnother visit to the agave
View attachment 163715
much ado about nothing (LRM)
Stunning!!View attachment 163848
“Close Encounters” capture taken at sunrise and edited in Hipstamatic
Nominated for January Image of the MonthView attachment 163848
“Close Encounters” capture taken at sunrise and edited in Hipstamatic
Ahhh the halcyon days of one week challenges!Agh, I nearly closed this Black and White Challenge!! I think all the ”excitement” has gone to my head.
Yes, we were all younger then. Sigh.Ahhh the halcyon days of one week challenges!
Nominated for January Image of the MonthView attachment 163715
much ado about nothing (LRM)
Nominated for January Image of the Month
superb image KevinView attachment 163848
“Close Encounters” capture taken at sunrise and edited in Hipstamatic
Thank youNominated for January Image of the Month
Thanks Johnsuperb image Kevin
Would be handy, indeed!Yes, we were all younger then. Sigh.
(And that's "younger" as in "less old" not as in "Juliana" because if we were all younger, most of us would be unnecesary, although she could probably use one or two extras, I imagine.)