MobiColour RESULT: MC #54 Theme: Low Perspective - Feb 6-12, 2017

RoseCat

RoseCat

MobiStaff
MobiStaff
MobiSupporter
Real Name
Catherine
Device
iPhone 14 Pro Max
Onsite
Project Page
color
[kuhl-er]

noun
1. the quality of an object or substance with respect to light reflected by the object, usually determined visually by measurement of hue, saturation, and brightness of the reflected light; saturation or chroma; hue.

adjective
1. involving, utilizing, yielding, or possessing color: a color TV.
_____________________

Welcome to MobiTog's color Challenge #54! The rules are easy: Post your mobile photography color images here - LIMIT OF 3 IMAGES IN ONE POST, preferably 1 image per post. No black & white, no shades of grey, just BOLD BRIGHT COLORS! Or, SOFT PASTEL COLORS. Whatever strikes your fancy, or your color palette. :D

The challenge will last one week, and then the winner of the prior challenge will choose the winner of the current challenge, who will then decide if there will be a theme to the next challenge or not, and what that theme will be. :sneaky:

Please see the Rules and Guidelines for MobiChallenges posted HERE.
Check out our previous winners in the Gallery HERE.

Let's electrify this space with C O L O R !!

_________________________

Theme: Low Perspective

The judge for this challenge is bohand!
 
Last edited:
IMG_3140.JPG

iPhone 7 Plus Portrait mode, no edits
 
RoseCat said:
Thanks! Saw a bunch of these spray painted pink triangles with a bit of pink plastic nailed into the center along the walking trail... must have some official park meaning but I don't know what.
Click to expand...
The nailed tag and the number make me think they might be surveyor's marks. But they could be marking the location of utility lines (gas, water, etc.), in which case the color and shape of the marks probably tell what's underneath. Could be a prelude to some construction.
 
I've got a question about the theme for Deborah bohand. So far we've got shots with a point of view low to the ground. What about shots taken low but looking up? Were you thinking of these as well? I mean something like the following. (This wouldn't be an official entry regardless because I've used it before, so no problem for me either way. Just trying to get it clear in my head.)

Snapseed.jpg
 
terse said:
I've got a question about the theme for Deborah bohand. So far we've got shots with a point of view low to the ground. What about shots taken low but looking up? Were you thinking of these as well? I mean something like the following. (This wouldn't be an official entry regardless because I've used it before, so no problem for me either way. Just trying to get it clear in my head.)

View attachment 88482
Click to expand...
It's funny you should ask that because, in the cafe today, I was going to photograph their huge light fitting, but Rog said that's not his idea of low angle, so I didn't. :confused:
 
terse said:
I've got a question about the theme for Deborah bohand. So far we've got shots with a point of view low to the ground. What about shots taken low but looking up? Were you thinking of these as well? I mean something like the following. (This wouldn't be an official entry regardless because I've used it before, so no problem for me either way. Just trying to get it clear in my head.)

View attachment 88482
Click to expand...

Great question and those shots are a great example of low perspective!
 
JillyG said:
It's funny you should ask that because, in the cafe today, I was going to photograph their huge light fitting, but Rog said that's not his idea of low angle, so I didn't. :confused:
Click to expand...

But that was exactly my thinking, too. Just looking up and take a picture from clouds or ceiling. What's wrong with it? I think Sir Green is on the wrong way, not you. And terse is right, too. Though, through my eyes, dear Ted, this picture is taken a bit to straight. Looks more eye to eye than lower perspective. Innit? [emoji4] (sorry, smart as alert …)
 
terse said:
The nailed tag and the number make me think they might be surveyor's marks. But they could be marking the location of utility lines (gas, water, etc.), in which case the color and shape of the marks probably tell what's underneath. Could be a prelude to some construction.
Click to expand...

Yes, I thought the same. But it's a bike/walking trail through woodland/swamps. Hopefully nothing too drastic.

Also saw several trees with these marking ribbons on them. They didn't necessarily line up with the triangles.

IMG_3182.JPG
 
GroovyGouvy said:
Though, through my eyes, dear Ted, this picture is taken a bit to straight. Looks more eye to eye than lower perspective. Innit?
Click to expand...
Does it? I'm pretty sure I was crouched down, knee on the ground, with the camera low, but it doesn't matter anyway for this one. I'm not entering it because I've used it in MC before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom