Glenton
MobiLurver
- Real Name
- Rodolfo Glenton
- Device
- Android (Generic)
Okay, I convinced! I'll get BeCasso
Okay, I convinced! I'll get BeCasso
Thanks Ted.I did two watercolor versions in BeCasso, one looser than the other. Then I blended them in iColorama and ran the result through more changes there, including more watercolor. Here's the tighter of the two BeCasso versions:
View attachment 80004
It is, and I was going to post it first. Then one of those weird blend modes in iColorama (difference, negation, one of those) changed the color. Once the Celestial Railroad appeared, I couldn't let it go.Thanks Ted.
Is so nice the BeCasso version.
I like this very much.I did two watercolor versions in BeCasso, one looser than the other. Then I blended them in iColorama and ran the result through more changes there, including more watercolor. Here's the tighter of the two BeCasso versions:
View attachment 80004
It is, and I was going to post it first. Then one of those weird blend modes in iColorama (difference, negation, one of those) changed the color. Once the Celestial Railroad appeared, I couldn't let it go.
Don't have a useful opinion yet. I've mostly been using iColorama for watercolor effects.Question: is it better than waterlogue or Brushstrokes.
You think of everything, JillyDon't forget to photograph it first - you never know, the next MCC theme might be Shirt with Dribble.
Don't forget to photograph it first - you never know, the next MCC theme might be Shirt with Dribble.
You think of everything, Jilly
I'd go ahead and get the beta testing if you haven't already done so. The link which I just visited still has the signup for beta testingIf one goes to this link you can sign up to be a beta tester and download BeCasso at no charge. You also need to have TestFlight from the App Store.
http://www.digitalmasterpieces.com/becasso/
You think of everything, Jilly
This version is so much better Ted imhoI did two watercolor versions in BeCasso, one looser than the other. Then I blended them in iColorama and ran the result through more changes there, including more watercolor. Here's the tighter of the two BeCasso versions:
View attachment 80004
What, you mean because the shadows don't make any sense in the blue version, and little things like that?This version is so much better Ted imho
But isn't BeCasso just another Prisma type app, turn your photo into an oil painting tra la la la la......View attachment 80039 BeCasso can make a very ordinary image look interesting. See below.
View attachment 80040
True, at least generally, and also like Waterlogue, Brushstroke, and many others. I think one difference between BeCasso and Prisma is that BeCasso gives you much more control of the final result. With Prisma, you can choose an effect to use and you can fade its application, but that's it. With BeCasso watercolor, on the other hand, you can control edge width, wetness, color intensity, and some other variables.But isn't BeCasso just another Prisma type app, turn your photo into an oil painting tra la la la la......
True, at least generally, and also like Waterlogue, Brushstroke, and many others. I think one difference between BeCasso and Prisma is that BeCasso gives you much more control of the final result. With Prisma, you can choose an effect to use and you can fade its application, but that's it. With BeCasso watercolor, on the other hand, you can control edge width, wetness, color intensity, and some other variables.
And you can also run the resulting image through other apps, like iColorama, so that BeCasso becomes just one layer in your processing stack.
To me, it feels pretty much the same as when I run an image through ACDSee or Camera Noir to create a b/w version (something I just finished doing, coincidentally).
I agree. All these apps can take a less than interesting photo and make it more appealing to the eye.If the photo is unedited except for what the app filter applies, that seems less like I "own" the photo, as opposed to doing my own editing before and/or after the filter is applied (the editing being what I would do with most photos that I post.)But isn't BeCasso just another Prisma type app, turn your photo into an oil painting tra la la la la......
Well, my DH has them for breakfast with his yoghurt and nuts and that's not quite the same and then you have the danger of chomping a pip when you think it's a nut. I stew them a little as well with a bit of sugar and I have to say it is one of my favourite breakfasts which I will now partake in more frequently rather than leaving them for the DH!What? No "chomp chomp chomp then-spit-seed-out-in-hand"?? That's my method.....
I agree. All these apps can take a less than interesting photo and make it more appealing to the eye.If the photo is unedited except for what the app filter applies, that seems less like I "own" the photo, as opposed to doing my own editing before and/or after the filter is applied (the editing being what I would do with most photos that I post.)
Never seen such a thing. Seems to leave the cherry pretty much in one piece, too?minutes with no stained hands. I removed the pips after each pitting to make sure that I had 6 each time. Sometimes, they clung to the bottom of the cherry. I don't know how robust it is and whether it will weather a significant amount of usage but at the moment I am WELL happy. My days of drudgery are over!
Pimped in BeCasso
View attachment 80054
View attachment 80055
Yes, it totally leaves the cherries in one piece. I did arrange them so the top of the cherry was at the top but I don't think you even need to do that.Never seen such a thing. Seems to leave the cherry pretty much in one piece, too?
Right. Less drudgery = more art.
Hmm. If I take a photo I like and post it without editing, or perhaps only with cropping, I certainly feel that it's mine. How does it become less mine by passing it through a further app? It still feels like mine to me. It may be less good than it was before, if I make a poor choice of filters and don't have the eye to recognize it, but that's a different matter. My screw-ups are as much mine as my successes.I agree. All these apps can take a less than interesting photo and make it more appealing to the eye.If the photo is unedited except for what the app filter applies, that seems less like I "own" the photo, as opposed to doing my own editing before and/or after the filter is applied (the editing being what I would do with most photos that I post.)